• Much discussion on blogshere on the public vs. private cloud debate. Good to see the discussion, but as Peter Galvin says – “opinions are inside the bldg, facts are outside.” So as always lets discuss this from a customer point of view.

    Let me start by saying every customer that I have talked to in the past 12 months says – that they will be going with a hybrid approach – combination of public and private clouds. The following are few things to think about before you decide on how you want to proceed.

    - Type of enterprise – if you are a Web-based business, then public cloud is a no brainer. Regulated industries like insurance and now financial services will have a tougher time to go only w/ public clouds. So you might start with a VMware-based private cloud offering and then as you decide to use or expose APIs/services to customers/partners or your compute cycles for a point project are exponentially high, you might opt for adding the public cloud to your strategy.

    - Use case – what you are doing will define how you do it. If the data is very sensitive and cannot leave the firewall, then you might decide to start with the private cloud. Just remember that is what people said about sales/forecast data. Salesforce.com is thousands of customers and their data seems pretty secure. Nevertheless, security of the data will be important criteria in deciding the private vs. public discussion.

    - Cloud provider type – self services (l EC2, Google) or high touch (Rackspace, Sunguard, etc.). This is mostly about how you would like to access services. High touch has its benefits, but is also expensive. Over a LONG period of time the lines will blur, but at least for the next decade the difference in approach will be stark.

    - Control – this goes back to the use case discussion above. Enterprises will want visibility and control. Granular control on things like authentication, authorization, data masking, etc. As with much of the Web/cloud approach, it has to be simple and has got to scale.

    Now for the controversial part. Much has been said about the Google outage. Recently blogged about it here. Rob Enderle recently used the Google outage to assert that private cloud models will win over public cloud models. Even though he makes good points, it is not what our customers are telling us.. This is not an either or discussion. Enterprise customers will do both.

    This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 20th, 2009 at 9:49 am and is filed under Thoughts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  • 6 Comments

    Take a look at some of the responses we've had to this article.

    1. May 20th

      Nice writing style. I look forward to reading more in the future.

    2. [...] Private/public clouds – interoperability between private and public cloud implementations has to be seamless – [...]

    3. [...] are issues. Many customers are doing POC, some are doing mission critical applications. The benefits of reduced costs and time to market/revenue are too compelling to ignore. This entry was posted on [...]

    4. Jun 1st

      da best. Keep it going! Thank you

    5. Kris Bhandare
      Jun 2nd

      There is also the use case when a business has both private and public clouds and want to be able to share excess capacity from either cloud or to lend capacity from private cloud to their public cloud, which could host applications related to their business. QOS for such use cases becomes a critical issue as well.

    6. Jun 15th

      How soon will you update your blog? I’m interested in reading some more information on this issue.

  • Leave a Reply

    Let us know what you thought.

  • Name (required):

    Email (required):

    Website:

    Message: