• Roundtable with Vivek Kundra – US Chief Information Officer

    Had the opportunity to meet and interact w/ Vivek Kundra at the NASA Ames Research Center yesterday. GREAT guy.As everybody knows, very big proponent of cloud computing.

    The good news is that he is driving the agenda with a focus on time to solution and costs.

    The hard part is going to be to get folks set in old habits to see the art of the possible. Success stories in private and public industry will go a long way to help. Sonoa is and will continue contributing to make this transformation possible.

  • Thoughts

    Posted on August 19th, 2009

    Written by Chet Kapoor

    Cloud brokers – a real business need

    Daryl Plummer and Frank Kenny from Gartner have been writing about cloud brokering for the past few months. eWeek covered their research and  James Urquart blogged about this yesterday.

    There is clearly a need for cloud brokering technology and probably a business around cloud brokers. Cloud brokers will be a combination of the support (think Rackspace’s fanatical support), technology (Sonoa and others will be technology providers) and consulting (networking and application level setup – even if it is just of SLA’s etc.). Cloud brokers will also need to understand how to sell and service enterprise customers. Telcos might step up, but others like pure consulting companies (cognizant, infosys) and possibly product/services companies like IBM, HP and even Cisco might want to capitalize on this opportunity.

    Cloud brokering technology and brokers serve a real need. the drum beat is going to increase as cloud computing takes hold in enterprises.

  • “Cloud Interoperability – is it a Pipe Dream ?”

    There is a lot of talk about interoperability between cloud providers. Let me explain the use case. Enterprise A uses a cloud and wants to make sure that they can ’switch’ to another cloud provider. The reasons for switching can be many – costs, better technology fit with new provider etc.

    A couple of important considerations for interoperability are the application and data.  Specifically:

    Data – not only do we have to discuss application portability, but also have to port the data. you may have noticed it is easy to import, but hard to export. The data world is very “sticky”. One of the biggest issues the US government is having with adopting Google apps – They want to know the format of the data, so if they ever decide to migrate away from google apps, they can do it.  One possibility is have multiple copies of the data.

    Application – the application that uses the API’s of the cloud provider has to seamlessly migrate to new chosen one. For anybody that has taken a look at the API of a couple of providers, you will notice that there is no significant overlap!! The providers built their API’s based on use cases and for now believe that they are going after different use cases/audiences. Even if this converges, it will be very hard to get the cloud providers to collaborate on a standard API. Standards have the ‘potential’ of further commoditizing their business, which already has low margins. One possible approach would be for the industry to accept a defacto standard.  But for that to happen, the providers have to start believing that they are going after the same use case/audience.  Another possible approach is to have a standards body define a standard. this one is harder, because if multiple vendors drive it then the standard become complex as it has to solve corner cases across the multiple targeted use cases – just as in the WS* standards process.

    One possible approach is focus on small slices like cloud security appliance with security. We at Sonoa are hoping the CSA with its customer centric approach might pave the way.

    This is a real issue, that needs to be worked on. thoughts/suggestions welcomed.

  • WSJ.com – change is accelerating (and in the API market as well)

    Interesting article in the wsj.com recently.  Authors argue that the pace of change is quickening- with compelling examples of entire industries – recorded music business and the newspaper business (and soon network television and book publishing) – that have been rearranged in only a few years.

    Lots of parallels to draw with what is happening with cloud computing and the API economy.

    Faster computation: Cloud computing is crushing the time to provision servers from weeks to minutes, and converting prohibitive capital investment into low operating expense.

    Quicker Access: Metcalfe’s law is working in APIs… as companies like TrueCredit.com open their apps and make it very quick/easy to consume their services; the value of what they provide grows quickly with each new connection.

    Shorter decision cycles: If you are running a business, assume that your biggest competitors are working on opening APIs to their data and apps.  You don’t want read about their API announcement and at that moment be behind.  Else you are the next Chicago Tribune.

    Favorite part – they ask the question -  “how do we control this increasingly out-of-control, interlinked world?

    Answer?  “online surge-protectors to stop run-ups and panics” and “better analytics”   – exactly how we describe Sonoa API Management :-)

  • Don’t sell architecture to business people

    Yesterday Anne Thomas Manes of Burton Group gave a “SOA Wake” talk at the Burton Group Catalyst 09 show -   explaining what she meant by her now-famous blog post ‘SOA Is dead: long live services”   As usual, good straight talk from Anne.

    Her point with the original post:  SOA got sold as a thing in itself, when really it was just set of principles to free up IT to be more responsive to deliver something of value to the business.  Go back to the definition – it’s just a service architecture – a means to an end.

    The part of the talk I liked:  Technology people love to talk about the means, not the end – or as Anne said – “Don’t sell architecture to business people.. that is what gets you into trouble.”

    Sometimes we make the same mistake talking about cloud computing.  Lots of focus on the ‘how it works’  but do the business people really care if it’s public, private, open source, built on microsoft, force or run by hamsters spinning in a cage?

    A recession isn’t good for anybody – but maybe it forces us to think of cloud computing in cold hard business terms – how are you going to survive by either finding new ways to make money (sell your old data or new services via APIs) or blow away your existing cost structure?   There are business people putting pressure on the cloud computing vendors to talk in these terms – not about architecture.

  • Thoughts

    Had the opportunity to meet and interact w/ Vivek Kundra ...

  • Subscribe to UpdatesSubscribe to the RSS feed to stay updated